GrapheneOS, Digital Forensics, and the Reality Behind “Data Extraction” Claims

News
GrapheneOS, Cellbrite, a Hacker, and data forensics

Main Content

GrapheneOS is an open-source, Android-based mobile operating system designed with a strong focus on privacy and security. In recent months, GrapheneOS has been the target of misinformation campaigns on social media, falsely claiming that the operating system had been compromised. These claims were largely based on misunderstandings—or deliberate misrepresentation—of consent-based data extraction, a standard concept in digital forensics.

Digital forensics involves collecting and analyzing electronic data for legal investigations. While often used legitimately, such tools can also be abused for surveillance, intimidation, or privacy violations. For this reason, the GrapheneOS development team prioritizes making unauthorized data extraction extremely difficult, especially without user consent.

A central actor in this discussion is Cellebrite, a company providing forensic tools to governments worldwide, including some authoritarian regimes. Cellebrite’s own documentation reveals that while their tools can exploit or brute-force nearly all mainstream Android devices and many iOS devices, they cannot hack fully updated GrapheneOS devices (since late 2022) without the user voluntarily unlocking the phone.

The distinction between BFU (Before First Unlock) and AFU (After First Unlock) states is critical. Devices in BFU state remain strongly encrypted, making data extraction extraordinarily difficult. 

GrapheneOS is specifically hardened to keep devices secure in both states, using features such as USB connection restrictions, hardware-backed encryption, and secure element throttling to prevent brute-force attacks.

On supported Pixel devices (Pixel 6 and newer), GrapheneOS leverages the Titan M2 security chip, which enforces strict limits on passcode attempts—eventually reducing them to one per day. This makes brute-force attacks against even a 6-digit PIN practically infeasible. Additionally, GrapheneOS includes an auto-reboot feature that automatically returns the device to the highly secure BFU state after a configurable period of inactivity.

The controversy that sparked recent social media attacks stems from the fact that Cellebrite, like any forensic tool, can extract data from any phone—GrapheneOS included—if the user unlocks it voluntarily. This is not a vulnerability, but a basic consequence of user consent. Similar misleading claims were made years ago regarding Signal, and were later debunked.

GrapheneOS remains one of the most resilient mobile operating systems available against forensic hacking tools. Its layered defenses, rapid security updates, and emphasis on user control make it especially suitable for individuals with high security and privacy requirements. Claims of compromise fail to hold up against technical facts, reinforcing the importance of informed discussion over fear-driven misinformation.

Original story published on: GrapheneOS and forensic extraction of data